I mentioned in An-atta: On Self and Non-self that because all things are conditioned, ever in flux and transient (anicca) they have no stable, no ‘real’ independent identity (an-atta). And that the an-atta doctrine is extremely difficult to comprehend.
And, Yet, it is the Buddha’s strategy to free oneself from identities and attachments. The Buddha guided his son Rahula to understanding of impermanence, and of how one has no stable independent identity (anatta). Let’s see how.
Discourses imparted to Rahula
1.1. The discourses delivered by the Buddha are classified in any number of ways. One such way of classifying his discourses is to treat them as those delivered as explanations or replies in response to questions posed by bhikkus, ascetics, kings, laymen etc; and , as those imparted by the Buddha voluntarily on his own accord. The better known among the discourses of the latter class are two discourses that the Buddha imparted to his son Rahula.
1.2. The first of the two (ambalatthika-rahulo-vada) was administered to Rahula when he was a boy of seven years. This one teaches Rahula about importance of speaking truth and the courage it takes to speak truth. The Buddha also asks his little boy to exercise diligence in thought, word and deed; and to assess in his mind the consequences that might befall him as well as others.
1.3. The second discourse (Maha- rahulo-vada) was imparted by the Buddha when Rahula was about eighteen years of age, on the threshold of blossoming into a fine young man. This Sutta teaches the ways to develop the perception of impermanence, abandoning the conceit of “I” notion (an-atta); and developing Mindfulness of the skandas (the aggregates that form the body) and Mindfulness of breathing.
The following is a brief account of the Sutta in a summarized form.
Maha-Rahulovada Sutta
Dhatus
2.1. The Buddha addressed in this Sutra as Sugata (one who speaks only what is true and beneficial) states that all matter in the world, whether be it in past, present or future; far or near; gross or subtle; or whatever should be perceived with the right understanding,”This is not mine; this is not ‘I’; this is not my atta (self)”.
He clarifies that sensations, perceptions, mental formations (sanskara) or consciousness or whatever are also matter. They too should be viewed with the right understanding,”This is not mine; this is not ‘I’; this is not my atta (self)”.
2.2. He then goes on to explain that the body is composed of five elements (dhatu):
:- of earth (pathavi dhatu – the property of solidity in body : solids, semi-solids, fibers etc.);
:- of water (apo dhatu –fluids and the property of fluidity in the body);
:- of fire (tejo dhatu – heat and properties of heat in the body);
:- of air (vayo dhatu – air and properties of air and gases in the body); and ,
:- of space (akasa dhatu– element of space and of void between the particles of matter and which separates them as also those in the property of space; and that which takes in what is consumed by the body).
2.3. Each of these elements (dhatu) in the body is one with the corresponding element in the outside world.
3.1. The Buddha asks Rahula to cultivate the practice of meditation in succession, on each of these elements, to become in mind like unto each element.
:- “Like unto earth not distressed, shamed or disgusted when unclean things are cast upon it”.
:- “Like unto water, not attached; not distressed, shamed or disgusted when it comes in contact with clean or unclean things”.
:- “Like unto fire not distressed, shamed or disgusted when it burns up a clean thing or an unclean thing.”
:- “Like unto air not distressed, shamed or disgusted when it blows upon a clean thing or an unclean thing”.
:- “Like unto the sky that does not stand upon anything and yet covers all agreeable and disagreeable things”.
He instructs Rahula to appreciate the nature; the agreeable and disagreeable attributes of each element; but, to reject identity with each of those elements, dhatus, so that “all agreeable and disagreeable contacts with those elements that arise will not overwhelm your mind”.
3.2. At the end of each cycle of meditation, the element that is meditated upon should be seen as it really is, with right-understanding, thus: “This is not mine; this is not ‘I’; this is not my atta, self”. Having thus rightly understood each element as it really is, one’s mind becomes free from attachment to each of the elements.
Tendencies
4.1. The Buddha then asks Rahula to cultivate the practice of meditation on other forms of matter too :
:- on goodness (metta) to be rid of ill will;
:- on compassion (karuna) to be rid of desire to injure;
:- on sympathetic joy (ananda) to be rid of aversion;
:- on equanimity (samata) to be rid of malice;
:- on foulness (dvesa) to be rid of attachment (raga); and
:- to cultivate the practice of meditation on the concept of impermanence (kshanika) to be rid of the conceit of atta ‘self’.
4.2. The nature and attributes of these sensations, perceptions, and mental formations too should be viewed with the right understanding: “This is not mine; this is not ‘I’; this is not my atta, self”.
4.3. He thereafter teaches the practice of mindfulness of the in-coming and out-going breath; and says ‘if you practice mindfulness again and again it should be immensely fruitful and greatly advantageous”.
Practice of Mindfulness
5.1. Rahula then practices mindfulness as he sits in a secluded place under a tree, cross-legged and keeping his body erect. He gently breaths in and breaths out with complete mindfulness.
“ When he makes a long inhalation, he knows: ’I am making a long inhalation’.
When he makes a short inhalation, he knows: ‘I am making a short inhalation’.
He trains himself to be clearly conscious of the whole stretch of the in-coming breath (at its beginning, at its middle and at its end).
He trains himself to be clearly conscious of the whole stretch of the out-going breath (at its beginning, at its middle and at its end).
He trains himself to calm down the strong inhalation as he breaths in.
He trains himself to calm down the strong exhalation as he breaths out.”
“Each time he inhales and exhales, he trains himself to be clearly conscious of sensations of piti (joyful satisfaction), of sukha (bliss), and of vedana (sensations and perceptions).
As he inhales and exhales, he is clearly conscious of volition (will or the ability to decide); and, He trains himself to calm down volitional activities as he inhales and exhales each time’.
“He trains himself to inhale and exhale with settled mind (on object of contemplation) liberated from defilements”.
“He trains himself to inhale and to exhale with repeated contemplation of each of these aspects of Dhamma (phenomena): impermanence of self (an-atta); of destruction of attachment or craving or passion (raga); cessation of conditioned existence; and the discarding of defilements”
5.2. The Buddha concludes the teaching to his son:
“Rahula, mindfulness of inhalation and exhalation when thus cultivated and practiced repeatedly is immensely fruitful and greatly advantageous.
Rahula, when mindfulness of inhalation is cultivated and practiced repeatedly the final inhalation of breath (moment of death) comes to cessation consciously”.
5.3. It is said; venerable Rahula delighted and rejoiced at the words of the Bhagava.
For more on Mindfulness please check here.
Please also check the links provided under.
Sources and references:
Twenty-five Suttas from Majjima pannasa; Satguru publications; Delhi; 1991.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.062.than.html
http://www.wwzc.org/translations/mahaRahulovada.htmhttp://www.metta.lk/tipitaka/2Sutta-Pitaka/2Majjhima-Nikaya/Majjhima2/062-maha-rahulovada-e1.html
Pictures are from Internet
sreenivasaraos
March 18, 2015 at 7:44 am
Sir,
The more I read the views of Buddha on the self the more I am convinced that Genopsych is the correct description of self.
Thanks,
DMR Sekhar
sreenivasaraos
March 18, 2015 at 7:44 am
Dear Shri Sekhar, It is possible. Genopsych, as you explained, may directly control/operate our behavior.And, it undergoes updating and development due to evolutionary reasons.
The Buddha too rejected the two extremes concepts of ‘Permanent Self’, and ‘Annihilation’. In his view, self/soul is not perceived as a permanent entity, or a static substance. But, it is understood as a dynamic process and churning of accumulated inclinations and tendencies which one experiences as perceptions, ideas or desires. The streams of consciousness ever changing arise and perish leaving behind no permanent “self”. It is an evolving process. It has also much to do with the environment towards which it gravitates.The last aspect , I believe , needs a bit of honing.
Regards
sreenivasaraos
March 18, 2015 at 7:46 am
Sir,
I posted this comment at:
http://knol.google.com/k/dmr-sekhar/genopsych-collection/3ecxygf1lxcn2/36#
Thanks,
Sekhar.
Dear Michael,
I read the content of “universality” with interest at the following site.
http://metasophy.org/
It appears that the philosophy of “Universality” is not clearly distinguishing “living systems” from “physical systems” in a way similar to that of the view of Libb Thims.
Click to access Life_-_a_Defunct_Scientific_Theory.pdf
Libb’s limitation as I try to understand is that he views life within the scope of known physical laws.
Libb’s view ultimately leads to pan psychism which is being explored by Ted Erickson also an American chemical engineer.
Further there is absence of clarity in the theory of “universality” when it comes to consciousness and “self awareness”. It appears that the theory of Universality extends consciousness to energy which is panpsychism. May see this links.
http://ssubbanna.sulekha.com/blog/post/2010/08/an-atta-on-self-and-non-self.htm
http://ssubbanna.sulekha.com/blog/post/2010/08/materialism-of-the-charvaka-and-rationalism-of-the.htm
http://ssubbanna.sulekha.com/blog/post/2010/08/an-atta-the-buddha-way-maha-rahulovada-sutta.htm
As far as I know Buddha did not preach about God and the idea of universality is same as or very nearer to Buddhism. Let us review our own positions.
Thanks,
DMR Sekhar.
sreenivasaraos
March 18, 2015 at 7:46 am
Dear Shri Sekhar, Wow..You have carried the debate to a different level.Lets see how it shapes up. Thank you and Regards
The primary tendency to evolve into higher forms of life is inherent to the organism which is modified by the environment. The purpose of evolution is the [self] preservation of the species, the life forms.
Life may be construed as a state of matter with distinct properties such as self programmability, consciousness and free will.
Future research needs to be directed towards understanding the genetic basis of the instincts and intra DNA quantum happenings and quantum computations for better understanding of living systems.
sreenivasaraos
March 18, 2015 at 7:48 am
A beautiful and clear exposition of mindfulness. Thich Nhat Hanh (Thây), founder of the Plum Village, teaches mindfulness very clearly in some of his writings. J.Krishnamurti also discusses mindfulness as ‘being attentive’ and observing…
Mindfulness is indeed precious
Raj Armugam
sreenivasaraos
March 18, 2015 at 7:48 am
Dear Raj, I am glad you read this again; and found it useful I tried here to summarize and narrate as simply as I could the discourse Maha- rahulo-vada imparted by the Buddha to his son.The Sutta is a straight and an uncomplicated narration. It is the pristine lesson in Mindfulness; and, is of immense practical utility.
I am not much familiar with J Krishnamurthi , his methods and his writings. But, I have read (The Miracle of Being Awake) and heard of Ven Thich Nhat Hanh the Mahayana Monk from South Vietnam. He was a saintly person; a great scholar, teacher and poet. He preached Mindfulness, the world over. He improved upon the Buddha’s instructions as in the Maha- rahulo-vada, based on his own experiences, observations and perceptions. He tried adopting the ‘Way’ to suit the needs of the present-day men and women. He used to say that the exercise of Mindfulness should not be viewed as toil, but as relaxed –encounter with reality.
Regards
sreenivasaraos
March 18, 2015 at 7:49 am
Dear Raj, As regards Ven Thich Nhat Hanh’s teaching, he used to ask one to imagine as if one were a pebble sitting at the bottom of the stream. The pebble when thrown into the stream goes straight into water, without twists and wandering; and reaches the bottom where it rests quietly and firmly. The breath is at the bottom of ones being; and mind is the pebble. The mind goes straight to the breath, and rests there in Mindfulness. The watching of the breath goes with the letting-go of everything else. It is at once Mindfulness and relaxation.
Regards