1. Muziris, as the ancient Greeks called it, was an important port on the Malabar Coast in Southern India . It was frequented by the ancient Greeks, Egyptians and Romans. Eudoxus of Cyzicus sailed into Muziris during his two voyages undertaken between 118 and 116 BC. Muzris, is mentioned in the Periplous of the Erythraean Sea and in Ptolemy’s Geography and is prominent on the Peutinger Table. Pliny referred to it several times in his Naturalis Historia. Pliny called this port primum emporium Indiae.
The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, which was written by an anonymous Greek merchant in the second half of the first century AD, shows a great increase in Roman trade with India.
The author of the Periplus, who probably visited India personally, described in detail the Roman trade with the ports of the Malabar Coast.
The most important port of the Malabar Coast was Muziris (Cranganore near Cochin) in the kingdom of Cerobothra (Cheraputra), which ‘abounds in ships sent there with cargoes from Arabia and by the Greeks’.
According to the Periplus, numerous Greek seamen managed an intense trade with Muziris:
“Muziris and Nelcynda, which are now of leading importance (…) Muziris, of the same kingdom, abounds in ships sent there with cargoes from Arabia, and by the Greeks; it is located on a river, distant from Tyndis by river and sea five hundred stadia, and up the river from the shore twenty stadia.” – Paul Halsall. The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, 53-54
They send large ships to the market-towns on account of the great quantity and bulk of pepper and malabathrum [cinnamon]. There are imported here, in the first place, a great quantity of coin; topaz, thin clothing, not much; figured linens, antimony, coral, crude glass, copper, tin, lead, wine, not much, but as much as at Barygaza [Broach]; realgar and orpiment; and wheat enough for the sailors, for this is not dealt in by the merchants there. There is exported pepper, which is produced in quantity in only one region near these markets, a district called Cottonora [North Malabar?]. Besides this there are exported great quantities of fine pearls, ivory, silk cloth, spikenard from the Ganges, malabathrum from the places in the interior, transparent stones of all kinds, diamonds and sapphires, and tortoise shell; that from Chryse Island, and that taken among the islands along the coast of Damirica [Tamil Nadu]. They make the voyage to this place in favorable season that set out from Egypt about the month of July, which is Epiphi.
This provides evidence for a great volume of trade in both directions. The Periplus reported the influx of coins; and, the largest number of Roman gold hoards has been found in the hinterland of Muziris; most from the period of the Roman emperors Augustus (r. 27 B.C.E.–14 C.E.) and Tiberius (r. 14–37 C.E.).
Black pepper was a major item of trade with the West along both the western and eastern coasts. This rich trade continued on the Malabar Coast through the medieval period. Other items traded were spices, semiprecious stones, ivory, and textiles. Western products coming into India included wine, olive oil, and Roman coins—and in later centuries horses.
A text of the Sangam era highlights this, too: ‘The beautifully built ships of the Yavanas came with gold and returned with pepper, and Muziris resounded with the noise’
There is no doubt Muziris was a major port in its time and was an Emporium, as Pliny called it.
[Strabo was more interested in northern India and in the ports between the mouth of the Indus and present Bombay and he reported next to nothing about South India, Sri Lanka and the east coast of India.]
When Ptolemy wrote his geography around AD 150 Roman knowledge of India had increased even more. He wrote about the east coast of India and also had a vague idea of Southeast Asia, especially about ‘Chryse’, the ‘Golden Country’ (Suvarna-bhumi) as the countries of Southeast Asia had been known to the Indians since the first centuries AD. However, recent research has shown that this so-called Roman trade was integrated into an already flourishing Asian network of coastal and maritime trade.
Pliny the Elder also commented on the qualities of Muziris, although in unfavorable terms:
“If the wind, called Hippalus, happens to be blowing, it is possible to arrive in forty days at the nearest market of India, called Muziris. This, however, is not a particularly desirable place to disembark, on account of the pirates which frequent its vicinity, where they occupy a place called Nitrias; nor, in fact, is it very rich in products. Besides, the road-stead for shipping is a considerable distance from the shore, and the cargoes have to be conveyed in boats, either for loading or discharging.” – Pliny the Elder, Historia Naturae 6.26
Regarding Muziris , Maddy in his webpage writes:
Muchiri pattanam, a location close to today’s Kodungallur, was not really a sea port as some believed. It was a city on the banks of the Periyar somewhat inland and accessed through the maze of canals. Roman Ships anchored out in the sea and transported their goods in small boats guided by local pilots through the canals to Pattanam. From centuries in the past until the 14th, the city was well known to the Arab and especially the Roman sailors who conducted trade with Malabar. Sometimes the ships went to Barygaza or Baruch, sometimes to Nelycinda (will be covered in a separate blog) other times, they landed up in Muziris. They came in with Western luxury goods and gold and took away spices and Eastern goods. Sometimes the ships went around the Cape Comorin and docked at Kaveri Poompattinam close to Pondicherry.
The Romans had expatriate settlements or colonies in both places as I mentioned before and much information about them can be found in Sangam Era writings like the Silappadhikaram and Manimekhalai. The Peutinger table shows Muziris on the Roman map and even alludes to an Agustus temple (later studies assume it was an Agasthya temple) in Muziris. Writers like Ptolemy, Pliny and so on had written much about the trade, so also the Tamil poets. So let us conclude that robust trade took place, until the floods of the Periyar wherein the riverbed got silted in the 13th Century. Since that event and due to other issues at the Roman and Arab areas, the trade petered off and veered off to other places like the Cochin and Calicut. But by then the Arab traders had a stronghold on the route and they staved off any competition until the next aggressive bunch – the Portuguese came in – followed by the Dutch and finally the English who eventually settled down and colonized the lands they came to trade with. But we will not talk about all the events that took place in the process, we will instead focus on the Muziris papyrus, something that you do not see often mentioned in mainstream media. And so we go to the rather active Roman Colony or river port called Pattanam well before the advent of Christ
Image taken from De Tabula Peutingeriana de kaart, Museumstukken II (edited by A.M. Gerhartl-Witteveen and P. Stuart) 1993 Museum Kam, Nijmegan, the Netherlands
2. In what is called a third century map (perhaps a copy of an earlier map) Muziris is shown prominently by drawing a circle round it. (Taprobane , indicated at the bottom of the map refers to Sri Lanka ). Pliny in his Natural History(6.26) mentioned that if one followed the wind Hippalus , one would reach Muziris in about forty days ( he was referring to the South West monsoon) . He also mentioned that the roadstead for shipping was at a considerable distance from the shore and that the cargoes are to be conveyed in boats, for either loading or discharging. He was indicating that Muziris was not along the coast but situated inland , reachable by a creek or a river. This was confirmed by the later Roman sources according to which “Muziris is located on a river, distant from Tindis – by river and sea, 500 stadia; and by river from the shore, 20 stadia”. Incidentally , Pliny did not recommended alighting at Muziris, as it was infested by pirates .
3. Since the days of Eudoxus, the Greeks and Egyptians established a flourishing trade with Southern India by taking advantage of what they called the Hippalus wind , meaning the South West monsoon winds. (Please see my post” Other Ancient Greeks in India ” for further details).The commodities the Greeks/Egyptians and Romans imported from India were precious gems, aromatics , spices – specially the pepper , besides cotton.
4. According to Prof AL Basham (The Wonder That Was India) :
The main requirements of the West were spices, perfumes,jewels and fine textiles, but lesser luxuries, such as sugar, rice and ghee were also exported, as well as ivory, both raw and worked. A finely carved ivory statuette of a goddess oryaksi has been found in the ruins of Herculancum . Indian iron was much esteemed for its purity and hardness, and dye stuffs such as lac and indigo were also in demand. Another requirement was live animals and birds; elephants, lions, tigers and buffaloes were exported from India in appreciable numbers for the wild beast shows of Roman emperors and provincial governors, though these larger beasts went mainly overland through the desert trading city of Palmyra; smaller animals and birds, such as monkeys, parrots and peacocks, found their way to Rome in even larger quantities as pets of wealthy Roman ladies. The Emperor Claudius even succeeded in obtaining from India a specimen of the fabulous phoenix, probably a golden pheasant, one of the loveliest of India’s birds.
In return for her exports India wanted little but gold. Pottery and glassware from the West found their way to India, and many shreds of Arretine and other wares, mass-produced in Western factories, have been found in the remains of a trading station at Arikamedu, near Pondicherry.
As regards the Gemstones , Muzris acted as the collecting and clearing point . The garnets and quartz came from Arikamedu region (on the East coast of south India), the pearls were from Gulf of Mannar , while lapis lazuli beads were from Kodumanal in the neighboring region. The other stones included diamonds, agate, beryls, citrines etc. Please check the following links that carry abundant details on the Gem trade: http://www.thebeadsite.com/abm-rio.html
There was some demand for wine, and the Western traders also brought tin, lead, coral and slave-girls. But the balance of trade was very unfavorable to the West, and resulted in a serious drain of gold from the Roman Empire. This was recognized by Pliny, who, inveighing against the degenerate habits of his day, computed the annual drain to the East as lOO million sesterces, “so dearly do we pay for our luxury and our women”.30 The drain of gold to the East was an important cause of the financial difficulties in the Roman Empire from the reign of Nero on wards. Not only gold, but coinage of all types was exported to India; Roman coinage has been found in such quantities in many parts of the Peninsula and Ceylon that it must have circulated there as a regular currency.
[Indian traders were active at both the Indian and the foreign ends of this maritime trade. Archaeological sites on the Red Sea have turned up potsherds with the names of Indians written in Tamil and in Prakrit. In India, archaeologists have identiﬁed the port of Arikamedu as the site of an ancient southeast Indian port mentioned in The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea.
Excavations there revealed Roman pottery, beads, and evidence of wines imported from southern Italy and Greece. Arikamedu seems to have traded with the eastern Mediterranean region from as early as the ﬁrst century B.C.E.]
There is good evidence that subjects of the Roman Empire, if not actual Romans, settled in India. There is mention of a temple of the Emperor Augustus at Muziris. Early Tamil literature contains several references to the Yavanas, who were employed as bodyguards by Tamil kings, or as engineers, valued for their knowledge of siege craft and the construction of war-engines. While the term Yavana was often used very vaguely, and, from its original meaning of “a Greek”, came to be applied to any Westerner, it is by no means impossible that the Yavanas of South India included fugitives from the Roman legions in their number.
Ptolemy’s geography of Asia
A section of the map of India drawn after Ptolomy’s Geographia, showing Muziris emporium
5. An indication of the importance of Muziris as a place for finalizing business deals by Roman traders was brought to light by L. Casson , a scholar, in his paper” New light on marine loans” .He mentioned about a papyrus (called P. Vindob. G 40822 -for identification purposes ), discovered during the year 1985 in Vienna , which sets out the details of a maritime loan agreement between a ship owner – possibly of the Hermapollon mentioned on the verso of the papyrus – and a merchant using the ship as security. The document suggests that the loan arrangement was agreed to while the parties were in Muziris (though possibly signed on arrival at the Red Sea), indicating a rather active Roman merchant colony on the Kerala coast
6. The heightened trade between Greece/Egypt and India came as a culmination of the trade relations that existed between India and the West even centuries earlier to Christian era.
7. Historians say Muziris, might be of significance in another way too. They say Christianity may have been introduced to the sub-continent through Muziris.
8. The successful run of the Greek/Egyptian trade with India suffered a temporary setback due to the rise of a new Parthian Empire that formed a sort of barrier between the Greeks and the Indians. However, when Rome started to absorb the remnants of the Empire of Alexander, Egypt came under the control of Romans. Egypt became a Roman province in 30 B.C. Thereafter, Augustus settled down and took charge of Egypt , as his personal property.
Interestingly , According to Pliny , writing in about 51 AD , the use of monsoon winds to shorten the passage to /from India was made known to the Romans only in the days of Claudius .( Pliny, N. H., 8, 101, 86). This development, therefore, must have come around 51 AD. There was, therefore, a long period of lull in the Egypt-India trade after 34BC.
9. The Roman trade with India, through Egypt, began in earnestness in the first century AD. Muziris then became an important Romans’ trading centre. The Rome/Egypt/India trade lasted famously until about sixth century.
10. Then suddenly and mysteriously, Muziris went off the radar. It was not mentioned again for a very long time. Dr Roberta Tomber of British Museum said.
“What is interesting is that in the 6th Century, a Greek writer, writing about the Indian Ocean , wrote that the Malabar coast was still a thriving centre for the export of pepper – but he doesn’t mention Muziris”.
No one has a clue how Muziris disappeared so completely.
[ Please read Indo-Roman trade by Ajoy Kumar Singh, Janaki Prakashan, 1988]
Regarding the trade in South India, Prof. Hermann Kulke and Prof. Dietmar Rothermund in their A History of India (Rutledge, London, Third Edition 1998-) write:
In the area around Coimbatore, through which the trade route from the Malabar Coast led into the interior of South India and on to the east coast, eleven rich hoards of gold and silver Roman coins of the first century AD were found. Perhaps they were the savings of pepper planters and merchants or the loot of highwaymen who may have made this important trade route their special target.
It also indicates that the South Indian ports served as entrepôts for silk from China, oil from the Gangetic plains which were brought by Indian traders all the way to the tip of South India, and also for precious stones from Southeast Asia. But, as far as the Eastern trade was concerned, the Coromandel Coast to the south of present Madras soon eclipsed the Malabar Coast. To the north of Cape Comorin (Kanya Kumari) there was the kingdom of the Pandyas where prisoners were made to dive for precious pearls in the ocean. Still further north there was a region called Argaru which was perhaps the early Chola kingdom with its capital, Uraiyur. The important ports of this coast were Kamara (Karikal), Poduka (Pondichery) and Sopatma (Supatama) (see Map 5). Many centuries later European trading factories were put up near these places: the Danes established Tranquebar near Karikal, the French Pondicherry, and the British opted for Madras which was close to Supatama
1.BBC News in its edition of 11 June 2006 , reported an archaeological investigation by two archaeologists – KP Shajan and V Selvakumar – has placed the ancient port as having existed where the small town of Pattanam now stands, on India’s south-west Malabar coast. The team believes Pattanam as the place where Muziris once stood. Until recently, the best guesses for the location of Muziris centred on the mouth of the Periyar River , at a place called Kodungallor – but now the evidence suggests that Pattanam is the real location of Muziris.
2. Pattanam is a small town some 12 km south of the Periyar river mouth (present day Kodungallur) , in Kerala state. The artefacts recovered from the excavation site include amphora (holding vessels) of Roman make and Yemenis, Mesopotamian, and West Asian ones too, indicating that Pattanam had trade not only with Rome but also with places in the Persian Gulf . The other artefacts recovered include pottery shards, beads, Roman copper coins and ancient wine bottles.
3.There is no doubt that Pattanam was a major port and was important to the Indo-Roman trade But more collaborative evidence is needed to support the view that Pattanam was indeed Muziris.
4. The remote sensing data revealed that a river close to Pattanam had changed its course .The port may have been buried due to earthquakes or floods. This may perhaps explain the disappearance of the Muziris port. However, there are no definite answers yet.
5. Interestingly, while the excavations at Muziris are on, another set of archaeologists from UCLA and University of Delaware have excavated Berenike, a long-abandoned Egyptian port on the Red Sea near the border with Sudan . The team has uncovered the largest array of ancient Indian goods ever found along the Red Sea , including the largest single cache of black pepper from antiquity – 16 pounds – ever excavated in the former Roman Empire .
Dr. Willeke Wendrich, an archaeologist at the University of California at Los Angeles, said the research showed that themaritime trade route between India and Egypt in antiquity appeared to be even more productive and lasted longer than scholars had thought.
In addition, it was not an overwhelmingly Roman enterprise, as had been generally assumed. The researchers said artefacts at the site indicated that the ships might have been built in India and were probably crewed by Indians.
These again confirm the trade relations that existed between ancient Egypt and India
March 21, 2015 at 5:51 pm
tamil sangam poems dating back to the early christian era are a source of information on the commerce and trade between foreign traders and south india.there is a town called musiri and another called thondi but not on the malabar coast.both exist now with these names in tamilnadu.
i will see if i can collect the information.my wife, dr.r.vijayalakshmy, had written in the courier some years ago about the maritime trade in south india.
thank you for your interesting and exhaustive blog on this and related topics.
March 21, 2015 at 5:51 pm
thank you vijaya
now , you mentioned thondi , i recall a reference to it in the periplus of the erathraen sea.talking about muziris it says:
54. tyndis is of the kingdom of cerobothra; it is a village in plain sight by the sea. muziris, of the same kingdom, abounds in ships sent there with cargoes from arabia, and by the greeks; it is located on a river, distant from tyndis by river and sea five hundred stadia, and up the river from the shore twenty stadia. nelcynda is distant from muziris by river and sea about five hundred stadia, and is of another kingdom, the pandian. this place also is situated on a river, about one hundred and twenty stadia from the sea.
please check this link
the book mentions a pandyan king and refers to chera-land(?).
there are speculations about the location of muziris. the pattanam excavation can be conclusive only in case it comes up with credible proof.
kindly let me know of mrs.vijayalakshmi’s work.
thank you pl keep in touch
March 21, 2015 at 5:53 pm
other reference material available in kodungallur city of st. thomas, g. menachery, 1987
st. thomas christian encyclopaedia of india ed. g. menachery, 1973
for more on this topic http://www.indianchristianity.com
March 21, 2015 at 5:56 pm
thanks for digging out an old and a forgotten post.
thanks also for sending me the link.
after i posted about muziris (may 2007), i had always at the back of my mind the developments in pattanam excavations. i occasionally check up anything new on that front.
i wrote about pattanam in connection with greek/ roman/egyptian trade with the west coast of india during the period first century to the sixth century ad. when i last checked up early in july 2008, i learnt that recent excavations on malabar coast brought up the remains of an ancient ship. i was startled to find that kchr took that as the proof of links between the malabar coast and the west that went as far back as 5th century bce.
the kchr director, dr. p j cheriyan, described the findings as evidence for the maritime activities in these parts as early as the fifth century bc. “the artifacts received from the excavation site suggest that pattanam, a hinterland port and a multicultural settlement, may have had links with the mediterranean, the red sea, the arabian sea and the south china sea rims since the early historical period of south india”.
i think, it is rather too early to speculate on that. it needs more proof.
as far as i know and according to the “known” history, the greek/egyptian trade with india which started with eudoxus of cyzicus when he sailed into muziris between 118 and 116 bc ran successfully for about a century. it then suffered a setback due to the rise of a new parthian empire that formed a sort of barrier between the greeks and the indians. however, as rome started absorbing the remnants of the alexander’ empire , egypt came under the control of romans. egypt became a roman province in 30 b.c. thereafter, augustus settled down and took charge of egypt , as his personal property.
the roman trade with india, through egypt, began in earnestness in the first century ad. muziris then became an important romans’ trading centre. the rome/egypt/india trade lasted famously until about sixth century.
then suddenly and mysteriously, muziris went off the radar. it was not mentioned again for a very long time.
kchr statement needs further support to be conclusive.
again, dr. m g s narayanan, former chairman of the indian council for historical research (ichr), has said that the port town of makotai mentioned in sangam literature was known as muciri in tamil and muziris in greek
that may be so, if proved. there is no doubt that muziris was a major port and was important to the indo-roman trade .but , more collaborative evidence is needed to support the view that pattanam was indeed muziris of the greeks and romans.
dr. narayanan went further and said the findings “take the history of makotai to even before the roman age, much deeper into the iron age.”
that is a huge statement. i am not sure if the present findings can adequately support such declarations.
i believe, it is necessary that kchr takes up further digging in the area, more under-water explorations before it comes up with clues leading to pre-greek links between india and the west.
[please check: makotai, ancient jews, and a 2500-year-old ship: globalization in an ancient world]
please also read my:
greeks in india before alexander
some other ancient greeks in india
have a nice time.
please keep talking.
March 21, 2015 at 5:57 pm
dear sreenivasa rao,
thanks for the interesting and instructive and knowledgeable comments. i have been myself interested in muziris (at cranganore / kodungallur or elsewhere) for more than four decades. may i draw your attention to the chapter on muziris in the book kodungallur…(1987) reprited in 2000 which may be browsed at http://www.indianchristianity.com/html/books.htm. there i have come across three direct references to muchiri in the samgham literature – akanaanooru and purananooru. many scholars are telling me there are many more such references there. could you kindly provide/collect more of these if possible. i shall be much obliged.
you may perhaps find some of the comments of prof. george menachery pertinent vis a vis muziris and other neighbouring places from antiquity.
July 9, 2021 at 10:05 pm
The statement that the ships rounded the Cape of Comorin and reached Pondicherry in the 1st C’s BCE/CE is difficult to accept. Western ships never ventured into the waters between Kanyakumari and Ceylon (Taprobane) because the sea was most turbulent and also had perhaps tricky mudbanks. All Western ships are reported to have rounded Taprobane to reach the East coast. All reports in the Sangam Literature speak of Walking journeys from the W coast to the E coast. In tradition Apostle That’s went from Kerala to the E coast walking through the forest roads carrying his spear or thrishool. Modern oceanographers from American and European Universities have pointed out the turbulent nature of the Cape Comorin sea which frightened Western pilots in the first centuries.
July 11, 2021 at 2:35 am
Dear Prof. George Menachery
I am honored to receive a comment from a learned Professor
I referred your observations to the author of the article -Maddy
This is what he said :
it is quite difficult to answer and go that back in time. I will try to find out. Meanwhile, pls peruse this paper which provides much detail.
You may also read the paper he forwarded (paragraphs 25 onward, in particular)
The paper also says
Under the reign of the emperor Claudius in the middle of the 1st century AD (Casson 1989), the route to Sri Lanka was definitely open for sailors. Pliny testifies that several sources attest to an important development of maritime knowledge around the middle of the 1st century AD.
There is archaeological evidence of Greek trading in the south of India since the 2nd century BC as many Greek amphorae have been found in the South-East around Arikamedu (Mathew 2017; Will 1996, 2004). It should also be mentioned that after the fall of the Mauryan Empire, a Greek Seleucid satrap called Diodotus settled a kingdom in 240 BC in Bactriane and Sogdiana. Later on, these sailors discovered the route from this strait to the harbor of Mouziris on the Southern coast of India. From this location, they could also sail to Sri Lank
Lets wait for his explanations